Another
Bloody Affray
Sad Termination
of a Family Quarrel
On the evening of
the 30th of
April 1873
, a bloody tragedy was enacted near
Bremen
, in this county, which resulted in the death of Mrs. Barbara
Schmelzer, by her brother-in-law, John Schmelzer. It
appears from the testimony that the farms of the parties
are separated by a creek, and neither party having a fence
along the creek, cattle could easily pass from one to the
other. Mrs. Schmelzer’s
cattle had been in the habit of breaking into John’s
fields, and on Wednesday last John impounded three of the
widow’s cows for trespassing, and in her efforts to
reclaim them, she lost her life.
It appears that a bad feeling had existed
between the parties for some time, and meddlesome neighbors
were partially instrumental in bringing the matter to a focus.
The news of the terrible tragedy spread
throughout the community and the wildest excitement prevailed,
and John was bitterly denounced by the citizens. He
was not arrested until Thursday morning, when he was taken
by a constable from
Bremen
and brought to this city.
On Monday, he had a preliminary examination
before Mayor Slough, which resulted in his being held to
answer to the charge of murder in the first degree. His
bond was fixed at $8,000, which he failed to give and was
committed to jail.
A large crowd listened to the testimony
and after the trial a great deal of sympathy was expressed
for the deceased and family, and considerable indignation
towards the defendant.
Mrs. Schmelzer left a grown son and several
small children.
John has a wife and several children. He was born in
Blessen
,
Germany
, in 1811, immigrating to this country in 1840, and settling
in the vicinity of his present home, almost immediately after
his arrival. He is a rough, illiterate man, small of
stature, bony and muscular, with a thin, emaciated countenance,
but nothing in it to noticeably indicate a predominance of
animal propensities, or to assimilate him with the common
culprit, or a man of desperate and impious qualities. On
the contrary, he seems like an inoffensive and harmless creature,
and in his ignorance has but the faintest conception of the
enormity of the deed he had perpetrated. He has always
sustained the reputation of a hard working, frugal, industrious,
through going farmer, and an honorable and upright citizen. However,
at home, it is said, that his temper is subject to frequent
and violent outbursts, and all coming in contact with him
are compelled to bend before his unyielding and willful nature.
The following is the substance of the
testimony given by the witnesses. Some
of the parties had never been on the witness stand and were
very much excited, and it was difficult to secure an intelligible
or accurate report of their testimony:
Wuniwald Schmeltzer
was the first witness called by the State. He
stated that he had known John Schmeltzer for twenty-one years;
were first cousins. Knew
Barbara Schmeltzer for some time; she was married to my first
cousin, Berton Schmeltzer and
brother to John; Berton Schmeltzer
(Jordon), died about 17 years ago. John
lived on his farm about three miles from
Bremen
; had lived there 14 or 15 years. John
lived on the west side of
Rush
Creek
, and Barbara on the east side, on her own land; she had
resided there about four years; was present
when the difficulty occurred; Barbara’s cow’s had
crossed the creek and got into John’s field. Her
boy came to my house about
8 o’clock
in the evening; he went up to John and claimed the cows,
when John told him that his mother must come. She sent
Peter, her son, over to pay the damages. After
John had refused to give up the cattle, Barbara went to his
house, and told his wife that she was not to blame. His
wife gave no reply, she then applied to John, when he told
her she could not have the cows, and in reply to her claim
of innocence made use of the very vulgar expression. Barbara
and her son Peter came to my house in the evening, and myself,
Peter and Barbara and my son Frank went over to John’s
gate, and called for him, and at first got no answer, but
he finally came out, when Peter asked him for his cow. John
said that Peter now claimed one of the cows, but before had
said that they all belonged to his mother, and called Peter
a d—d liar, Peter replied, calling him a liar. John
repeated that he could not have the cows, and that Barbara
must come. Peter
then told Barbara what John said, and she went up, and said
to him, “I did offer you damages.” John
replied, “you killed my brother and you want to kill
me.” She then said to me that we would now
go and get the cows. I
then went up to John and called him a hog-head, and told
him he had no right to pen up these cows. He said I
should go home, it
was none of my business. We
then went up the lane; did not see the cows; stable is south-west
of the barn, and south of the road; house is about a rod
north of the road; stable on the south side. John
was near the stable all the time; the barn and stable are
about two rods apart. Peter threw down two rails of
the fence, and I threw down two, John said we should not
go in, or he would shoot us. My son Frank said “if
you shoot, we will shoot too.” Frank
then advised Barbara to go in, saying he would not dare to
shoot her. John went and got his gun; had it in the
barn. Did not
notice him have a gun at any time; it was too dark for me
to see. Barbara
went up near the fence, and stopped about a minute; John
said something, I could not understand, and I then heard
the gun crack. Barbara ran a few steps and cried “I
am shot; O, Lord, that hurts.” I
then told Frank to give me the gun, and I would shoot him. Frank
gave me the gun and I went around to the gate to look for
John. I went
inside and met John who struck at me, and I struck at him,
but did mot hit him. He said “don’t
come here, I will kill you.” I
then jumped back. John remained around the barn, and
I went away. Barbara
was near me when she was hit. I
asked her where he had hit her, and she did not answer; she
leaned against the fence. Peter then took her in his
arms, and she soon expired. There
was no one present but me and the boys. John
did not offer any assistance. The
gun was loaded with shot.
In reply to cross-examination witness
stated that he heard John say that Barbara did not care anything
for his brother. John’s son came after she was
dead. Louis got his express and hauled her home. The
night was dark; it was a little cloudy. When
Peter came to our house he had his gun; when we went to John’s
Frank carried the gun. John lives about half a mile
from my house. Me and
Barbara stood behind the smoke house while Peter talked
to John. I received one shot in my arm; stood near
Barbara when she was shot. Did not see a gun in John’s hand. Peter ‘s gun
was a rifle.
Peter
Schmeltzer examined – Barbara was my mother;
she was 47 years old. In
the afternoon she came to me and said the cattle had
crossed the creek and got into John’s field. This
occurred an hour before sunset. She
asked what should be done. I
told her to send one of the boys after them. One
of the boys was watching the cattle. The
creek runs between my mother’s and John’s
land; it is about seven rods wide. The
field was fenced, except along the creek; thought there
were seven head of cattle. The field was part
pasture and part wheat. Mother
and the children waded through the creek after the
cattle; she did not get them; and sent me after them,
and told me to make it all right with John; he had
penned up three and turned the rest into the road. Went
to John’s house and found him in the barn. He
asked me whether it was right to try and break down
a neighbor by pasturing stock on his farm. I
replied that I did not. I
then told him that mother had sent me for the cows,
and he said I should not have them, and that mother
must come for them. I
had my gun with me, I then went to the creek, and told
mother what he had said. She then waded through
the creek, and we went back to John’s. I
went with her as far as the gate. She
was told that he was at the barn. He
was sent for, and came down. Mother
asked him what had happened; I did not hear the answer;
she said she would like to have the cows, and would
pay the damages. John
gave a vulgar reply, and said she should not have the
cows or pay the damages. She then came out of
the house, and went to Wuniwald’s. When
I started to John’s, mother advised me not to
take the gun; I replied that I might see something
along the road to shoot muskrats or something else. It
was a rifle, Mother
had $71 with her. Wuniwald said there was no
danger, that John would not shoot. I
carried the gun part of the way and Frank part. When
we arrived at John’s there was a light burning,
which was put out. I called five or six times
at the gate, and then knocked at the door, but got
no answer. I
then started to get the cattle, and while passing the
barn, heard someone walking inside. I
called and John answered. I
told him I wanted the cows, and he said I could not
have them. I
then told him I was going to let them out. He
said I should go ahead, and he would see about it. I
then again offered to pay him damages, and he repeated
what he said before. I says John
one of those cows is mine. He
says you were here awhile ago, and you said all of
those cows belonged to your mother. (can’t read
)could hear him following. He
said “your mother killed my brother and she would
like to break me down too.” I then
commenced tearing down the fence. Mother
heard John’s remarks and said “now
boys that’s enough, we will go and get
those cows.” Wuniwald,
Frank and mother ran up to the fence and Wuniwald
helped to tear down the fence. John
said, if you don’t stay back I will shoot you. Mother
then stepped in between me and Wuniwald when he shot
her. She
said, “Oh! God! I am hurt!” she then started
to run. I got some clubs and threw at John, and
hit him twice. By
this time I saw mother down beside the fence, and heard
the blood run, and she was fainting. I took her
in my arms and tried to get her to speak, but she could
not; she died in about half an hour. We got John’s
boys to hitch up, and hauled her home. John
remained inside of the fence until she was dead. His
wife then came out and tried to take the gun from him;
he said “no! no! I
will get some more of them.” His
wife and little girl urged him to come in to the house. He
said “No, I will load up and
get some more of them.” His
three boys then came up and tried to take the gun from
him, and said, “Father you have killed that poor
woman.” Did
not hear him make any reply. He
soon after went in the house. The
shooting took place about two hours after dark. John
was about a rod and a half from mother when he
shot. Could see him. Could see, as it was
moonlight. Could
distinguish a woman from a man. Wuniwald said he had often
heard John threaten to shoot, but thought
there was no danger. Frank
said to me, “You had better come back, he will
shoot.” Louie came up and said, “If
Pete had been at home this would not have happened.” We
asked if he was drunk, and he said, “No,
he was perfectly sober.”
Answer to question by Mayor – Our
cows have been in the habit of breaking into John’s
field; happened pretty often last year. Had been trouble about
the matter before. Did
not know of any other ill feeling existing.
Frank Schmeltzer examined – Was
at home when Peter and his mother came. I
was between 7 and
8 o’clock
. Peter asked
me to go, and see if we could get the cows. Father
said we should not raise any fuss, but go and ask for the
cattle. Mrs.
S. asked father to go along. I
carried the gun. Peter
called for John when he arrived; then he tapped against the
door, the lights were put out. After knocking and receiving
no answer Peter started to let out the cattle. I
told him to come back, which he did. I
heard some one walking in the barn, which I thought, was
John. He asked John for the cows, and offered
the damage. I
told John that here was the owner, and she came up, and we
told her what was said. John said “you killed
my brother and you would like to kill me.” She
replied “that’s is enough.” He
then started to the barn and got the gun and stamped it on
the ground; he then pulled the hammer back and says, “here goes,” and
shot. He then
went up to the barn gate, and we got to throwing stones. I
threw two or three and Peter Schmeltzer threw some. He
then went down to the barn, and leaned against the barn. After
the shot Mrs. Schmeltzer screamed. I then left. Saw
him have the gun when he went into the barn, but had none
when I first saw him. It
was dark; he was about twenty feet from her when he
shot. I
threatened to shoot, if he did. There was some
talk between me and Peter about the gun on the road
over but do not remember what.
Cross – examination - Did not want
to shoot John, but felt like doing so.
George Schorr, examined.-Am a brother
of Barbara; was in bed when my wife heard the report of
a gun. Soon Frank
Schmeltzer came to my house, and informed me that John had
shot my sister. I
went to her home and felt her pulse and endeavored to arouse
her, but found she was dead.
Mrs. Keller-Was called to Mrs. Schmeltzer’s;
got there between 10 and
11 o’clock
; did not examine her wounds; helped to lay her out.
Dr. T. W. Evans, of
Bremen
, assisted Dr. Tom O. Edwards, J., in making a post mortem
examination. Found posterior and inner surface of right
thigh punctured with eighteen shot; the phemeral artery
and phemeral vein were badly
lacerated; the left thigh was punctured with seven shot. The
phemeral vein
and phemeral artery was nearly
torn in two. The
brain and body was in a healthy condition. Was of the opinion that either of the wounds would have produced
death. The
tearing of the phemeral artery would produce death
in about twenty minutes. Had
know defendant for about fifteen years; his pecuniary
circumstances are good; he was worth about $12,000. Had
no doubt as to death resulting from gunshot.
Dr Tom O. Edwards, Jr.-Stated that he
had made a complete post mortem examination, and gave the
particulars in detail. His testimony was substantially
the same as that of Dr. Evans.
Brief remarks were made by Mr. Reeves,
on the part of the State, and by Mr. Martin, counsel for
defendant.
Under the Constitution of Ohio all offenses
are bailable, except capital cases (that is cases punishable
with the death penalty) when the proof is evident or the
presumption great. On
preliminary examination of a party accused of murder in the
first degree, therefore, it is the duty of the examining
magistrate to hold the accused entitled to be admitted to
bail, unless the testimony shows a clear and plain or strongly
presumptive case of murder in the first degree. If
the magistrate has substantial and reasonable doubts, from
the testimony, whether the offense is murder in the first
degree, he cannot deny the accused the right, which the
highest law of the land accords to him.
It requires only a probable case of murder
in the first degree to make it the duty of the examining
magistrate to hold the accused to answer to that offense.
There is, therefore, not the slightest
legal inconsistency in holding a party to answer to the charge
of murder in the first degree, and at the same time holding
his right to be admitted to bail.
In the case against Schmeltzer, because
of testimony tending to show provocation to anger and hot
blood, the Mayor had doubts as to the grade of the homicide,
and, therefore, decided that the defendant ought not to be
excluded from bail.
*John N Schmelzer was sentenced to 10
years hard labor and sent to the Ohio State Penitentiary
on
December 5, 1873
for manslaughter. His
prison records can be found at the Ohio Historical Society,
Columbus
Ohio
(71 N). John was pardoned after he served 4 years
of his sentence because of his wife’s illness and
requests made by the jury.
Prison record #9650
John
Schmelzer
Age 57
Education-No English
Statement of property – 160
acresWife-GertrudeChildren-6-----Lewis, Philip, John, *Julia, Mary, CarolineMother-Brothers- Leopold, Anson, & Otto
Height
5’7 ½”
Eyes- Blue
Hair- Brown and Grey
Complexion-
Common
General Appearance- Medium broad forehead, eyes sunken
and close, thick straight nose, ears lie back,
high cheek bones, heavy jaw, rugged face, stoops, broken
down.
*This account was found in the
Lancaster Eagle,
May 8th 1873
at the Ohio Historical Society.
*Complete trial record in the
Lancaster
paper microfilm section Lancaster Library,
Lancaster
,
Ohio
. |